NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Tweedie v R [2015] NSWCCA 71 Hearing dates: 16 April 2015 Decision date: 16 April 2015 Before: Basten JA at [53]; R A Hulme J at [1]; Adamson J at [59] Decision: 1. Leave to appeal against sentence granted. 2. Appeal dismissed. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – appeals – appeal against sentence – dishonesty offences – fraud – larceny – goods in custody – whether judge's rejection of applicant's evidence of remorse procedurally unfair –where evidence not challenged in cross-examination – where no indication given at hearing that evidence was to be accepted – open to the judge to reject applicant's evidence of remorse - no denial of procedural fairness
CRIMINAL LAW – appeals – appeal against sentence - aggregate sentencing – whether principles of aggregate sentencing properly applied – criminality of individual offences appropriately assessed - judge not required to detail process of accumulation and application of principle of totality – no error established
CRIMINAL LAW – appeals – appeal against sentence – aggregate sentencing – discount for guilty plea – discount not to be applied to aggregate sentence – discount a matter to be taken into account in determining indicative sentences – no error established Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) ss 117, 192E, 527C Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW) ss 21A, 22, 53A Criminal Procedure Act 1986 (NSW) s 166 Cases Cited: Dang v R [2014] NSWCCA 47 Dinsdale v The Queen (2000) 202 CLR 321 JM v R [2014] NSWCCA 297 Liles v R (Cth) [2014] NSWCCA 289 R v Brown [2012] NSWCCA 199 R v Nykolyn [2012] NSWCCA 219 Subramaniam v R [2013] NSWCCA 159 Toole, Kurt v R; Toole, Joshua v R [2014] NSWCCA 318 Truong v R; R v Le; Nguyen v R; R v Nguyen [2013] NSWCCA 36 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Carl Lyle Tweedie (Applicant) Regina (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Mr J Nicholson SC (Applicant) Mr P Ingram SC (Crown) Solicitors: S Alexander Solicitor for Public Prosecutions File Number(s): 2013/236458 Decision under appeal Court or tribunal: District Court Date of Decision: 7 March 2014 Before: King SC DCJ File Number(s): 2013/236458
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate