NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Scott (No 5) [2015] NSWSC 462 Hearing dates: 2 April 2015 and 7 April 2015 Date of orders: 07 April 2015 Decision date: 21 April 2015 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Wilson J Decision: Applications for Discharge of the Jury Refused Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – legal representation – former counsel granted leave to withdraw – new counsel instructed – asserted prejudice to accused – multiple applications by accused for discharge of jury - whether accused can be properly represented – other matters giving rise to prejudice – cumulative effect of matters leading to prejudice – adequacy of directions as a means to cure any possible prejudice - question of whether the accused can receive a fair trial – applications refused Cases Cited: Gilbert v The Queen [2000] HCA 15; (2000) 201 CLR 414; M v The Queen [1994] 181 CLR 48 Mansaray v R [2015] NSWCCA 40 R v Alexandroaia (1995) 81 A Crim R 286 R v Dudko [2002] NSWCCA 336; (2002) 132 A Crim R R v Scott (No 1) [2015] NSWSC 458 R v Scott (No 3) [2015] NSWSC 460 R v Scott (No 4) [2015] NSWSC 461 SKA v The Queen [2011] HCA 13; 243 CLR 400 The Queen v Glennon [1992] HCA 16; (1992) 173 CLR 592 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Regina Michael Scott Representation: Counsel: Mr. J. Bowers (Crown) Mr. W. Flynn (Accused) Solicitors: Solicitor for Public Prosecutions (Crown) Archbold Legal (Accused) File Number(s): 2013/00104881
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate