NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Murray v R [2015] NSWCCA 75 Hearing dates: 14 April 2015 Decision date: 27 April 2015 Before: Basten JA at [1]; Simpson J at [32]; Adamson J at [34] Decision: (1)Grant the applicant leave to appeal against the sentence imposed upon him in the District Court on 7 August 2013.
(2)Allow the appeal and set aside the sentence imposed by the District Court on 7 August 2013 at Wollongong.
(3)Remit the matter to the District Court for sentencing the offender, according to law. Catchwords: APPEAL – reasonable apprehension of bias – sentencing – appeal against sentence – shoot with intent to cause grievous bodily harm – guilty plea entered – applicant previously found not guilty by jury for another serious offence – sentencing judge expressed firm view as to applicant's guilt in previous proceedings – application for recusal rejected – whether the judge should have recused himself for apprehended bias
APPEAL – sentencing – appeal against sentence – shoot with intent to cause grievous bodily harm – guilty plea on first day of trial – conviction entered – parties proceed on the assumption of utilitarian discount on sentence – no discount awarded – whether lack of notice that no discount will be given constituted denial of procedural fairness
APPEAL – sentence appeal – where sentence affected by apprehended bias – whether such decision a nullity – whether invalid order of inferior court can be subject of appeal – whether remittal or re-sentencing appropriate Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), s 33A Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW), ss 3A, 21A, 22 Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW), ss 5, 6, 12 Cases Cited: British American Tobacco Australia Services Ltd v Laurie [2011] HCA 2; 242 CLR 283 Calvin v Carr [1980] AC 574 Ebner v Official Trustee in Bankruptcy [2000] HCA 63; 205 CLR 337 Johnson v Johnson [2000] HCA 48; 201 CLR 488 Lee v The Queen [2014] HCA 20; 308 ALR 252 Michael Wilson & Partners Pty Ltd v Nicholls [2011] HCA 48; 244 CLR 427 Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Bhardwaj [2002] HCA 11; 209 CLR 597 Parker v Director of Public Prosecutions (1992) 28 NSWLR 282 State of New South Wales v Kable [2013] HCA 26; 87 ALJR 737 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Adam Scott Murray (Applicant) Regina (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Mr T Gartelmann (Applicant) Ms G O'Rourke (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate