NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Nadarajapillai v Naderasa [2015] NSWCA 109 Hearing dates: 30 March 2015 Date of orders: 27 April 2015 Decision date: 27 April 2015 Before: McColl JA at [1]; Macfarlan JA at [2]; Emmett JA at [3] Decision: Appeal dismissed with costs. Catchwords: CONTRACTS – loan agreement – term of agreement provided that creditor must give 90 days' notice to debtor before requiring repayment – whether such notice had been given
PROCEDURE – pleadings – whether material facts alleged supported cause of action pleaded – compliance with Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), rr 6.12(6) and 6.12(7)
PROCEDURE – judgments and orders – whether primary judge made necessary findings of fact – whether primary judge gave adequate reasons for decision Legislation Cited: Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), r 6.12 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Pirpakaran Nadarajapillai (Appellant) Ravindran Naderasa (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: J Patel (solicitor) (Appellant) B Loukas (Respondent)
Solicitors: Jagdish Patel (Appellant) Mark Campbell & Company (Respondent) File Number(s): 2014/137518 Publication restriction: Nil Decision under appeal Court or tribunal: District Court of New South Wales Date of Decision: 10 April 2014 Before: Kearns DCJ File Number(s): 2013/28630
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate