NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: State of New South Wales v Ley Thomas Baker (No 2) [2015] NSWSC 483 Hearing dates: 21 March 2014 Date of orders: 21 March 2014 Decision date: 29 April 2015 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Adams J Decision: 1. Pursuant to s 5C and s 9(1)(a) of the Crimes (High Risk Offenders) Act 2006 (the Act) that the defendant be subject to a high risk sex offender extended supervision order for a period of three years from the date of the order; and
2. Pursuant to s 11 of the Act, directing that the defendant, for the period of the extended supervision order, comply with the conditions set out in Schedule A to the amended summons. Catchwords: EXTENDED SUPERVISION ORDERS – Crimes (High Risk Offenders) Act 2006 – Unacceptable risk of re-offending if not supervised – Reasonable conditions Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 Crimes (High Risk Offenders) Act 2006 Dangerous Sexual Offenders Act 2006 (WA) Cases Cited: Director of Public Prosecutions (WA) v Williams [2007] WASCA 206 State of New South Wales v Richardson (No 2) [2011] NSWSC 276 State of New South Wales v Scerri [2012] NSWSC 271 State of New South Wales v Tillman [2008] NSWSC 1293 Wilde v State of New South Wales [2015] NSWCA 28 Category: Principal judgment Parties: State of New South Wales (Plaintiff) Ley Thomas Baker (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: L A Fernandez (Plaintiff) A Evers (Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate