NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: State of New South Wales v Hill [2015] NSWSC 489 Hearing dates: 5 February 2015 Date of orders: 05 February 2015 Decision date: 29 April 2015 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Wilson J Decision: Extended Supervision Order Made for the period of 5 years, with conditions. See paragraph [85] for full details Catchwords: HIGH RISK SEX OFFENDER – application for extended supervision order pursuant to Crimes (High Risk Offenders) Act 2006 - dispute as to making of order – dispute as to duration and conditions attaching to order – no question of principle Legislation Cited: Child Protection (Offenders Prohibition Orders) Act 2004 Child Protection (Offenders Registration) Act 2000 Crimes Act 1900 Crimes (High Risk Offenders) Act 2006 Drugs Misuse and Trafficking Act 1986 Cases Cited: Attorney General for the State of NSW v Tillman [2007] NSWCA 119 Director of Public Prosecutions WA v GTR [2008] WASCA 187; (2008) 198 A Crim R 149 Director of Public Prosecutions WA v Williams [2007] WASCA 206; (2007) 176 A Crim R 110 NSW v Richardson (No. 2) [2011] NSWSC 276 NSW v Thomas (Preliminary) [2011] NSWSC 118 NSW v Tillman [2007] NSWSC 605 State of NSW v Cruse [2013] NSWSC 1733 State of NSW v Fisk [2013] NSWSC 364 State of NSW v Hill [2014] NSWSC 1803 Category: Principal judgment Parties: State of New South Wales (Applicant) Glen David Hill (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: DT Kell (Applicant) P Johnson (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate