NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: R v Harris [2015] NSWCCA 81 Hearing dates: 16 April 2015 Decision date: 01 May 2015 Before: Basten JA at [1] R A Hulme J at [2] Adamson J [3] Decision: (1) Appeal allowed.
(2) Quash the sentences imposed by Wells DCJ on 19 August 2014 and, in lieu thereof, sentence the respondent to an aggregate term of 7 years 6 months with a non-parole period of 5 years 6 months to commence on 15 August 2013. The earliest date on which the respondent will be eligible for release is 14 February 2019. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – Crown appeal against sentence – s 5D Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW) – dangerous driving causing death of three people and grievous bodily harm to a fourth – decision to drive while affected by drugs which tended to induce epileptic fit – extent to which long-standing frontal lobe injury affected judgment – whether individual or total sentences manifestly inadequate – relevance of guideline judgment in R v Whyte [2002] NSWCCA 343 – Crown discharged onus of establishing that residual discretion ought not be exercised Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), ss 52A(1)(c), 52A(3)(c), 154A(1)(a) Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW), s 5D(1) Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW), ss 21A, 37A Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985 (NSW), s 12(1) Cases Cited: CMB v Attorney-General (NSW) [2015] HCA 9 Dinsdale v The Queen [2000] HCA 54; 202 CLR 321 Georgopolous v R [2010] NSWCCA 246 Griffiths v The Queen [1977] HCA 44; 137 CLR 293 Khoury v R [2011] NSWCCA 118 Markarian v The Queen [2005] HCA 25; 228 CLR 357 Muldrock v The Queen [2011] HCA 39; 244 CLR 120 R v Campbell [2014] NSWCCA 102 R v Dodd (1991) 57 A Crim R 349 R v Geddes (1936) 36 SR (NSW) 554 R v Gillett [2006] NSWCCA 370 R v Hernando [2002] NSWCCA 489 R v Sivell [2009] NSWCCA 286 R v Whyte [2002] NSWCCA 343; 55 NSWLR 252 Veen v The Queen (No. 2) [1988] HCA 14; 164 CLR 465 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Regina (Applicant) Malcolm Harris (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: P Ingram SC (Crown) T Gartelmann (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate