NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: R v Feuerstein [2015] NSWCCA 82 Hearing dates: 24 November 2014 Date of orders: 04 May 2015 Decision date: 04 May 2015 Before: Hidden J at [1] Price J at [59] Schmidt J at [61] Decision: Appeal dismissed Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – Crown appeal against sentence – aggregate sentence for child sexual assault offences over 20 year period – partly cumulative sentences for offences of possessing and disseminating child abuse material – whether adequate degree of accumulation of indicative sentences in arriving at aggregate sentence – whether adequate accumulation of sentences for child abuse offences – whether overall sentence and effective non-parole period manifestly inadequate Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 Crimes (Administration of Sentences) Regulation 2014 Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 Sentencing Act 1989 Weapons Prohibition Act 1998 Cases Cited: AB v The Queen [1999] HCA 46; (1999) 198 CLR 111 Attorney General's Application under s 37 of the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 No 1 of 2002 [2002] NSWCCA 518; 56 NSWLR 146 Bugmy v The Queen [2013] HCA 37; (2013) 249 CLR 571 CMB v Attorney General for New South Wales [2015] HCA 9 Everett v The Queen [1994] HCA 49; (1994) CLR 295 GN v R [2012] NSWCCA 96 Hili v The Queen [2010] HCA 45; (2010) 242 CLR 520 Ibbs v The Queen [1987] HCA 46; (1987) 163 CLR 447 Magnuson v R [2013] NSWCCA 50 Markarian v R [2005] HCA 25; (2006) 228 CLR 357 Martin v R [2014] NSWCCA 124 McLaren v R [2012] NSWCCA 284 Minehan v R [2010] NSWCCA 140, 201 A Crim R 243 MLP v R [2014] NSWCCA 183 Muldrock v The Queen [2011] HCA 39; 244 CLR 120 Paxton v R [2011] NSWCCA 242; (2011) 219 A Crim R 104 Pearce v The Queen [1998] HCA 57; (1998) 194 CLR 610 Postiglione v R [1997] HCA 26; (1997) 189 CLR 295 Power v The Queen [1974] HCA 26; (1974) 131 CLR 623 R v AD [2005] NSWCCA 208 [2008] NSWCCA 289; 191 A Crim R 409 R v AJP [2004] NSWCCA 434; (2004) 150 A Crim R 575 R v Allpass (1993) 72 A Crim R 561 R v Booth [2009] NSWCCA 89 R v Borkowski [2009] NSWCCA 102 R v Brown [2012] NSWCCA 199 R v Cheung; R v Choi [2010] NSWCCA 244; (2010) 203 A Crim R 398 R v Clarke [2013] NSWCCA 260 R v Deng [2007] NSWCCA 216; (2007) 176 A Crim R 1 R v Gommeson [2014] NSWCCA 159 R v Hamid [2006] NSWCCA 302 R v Hernando [2002] NSWCCA 489; (2002) 136 A Crim R 451 R v Hersi [2010] NSWCCA 57 R v Jarrold [2010] NSWCCA 69 R v Jones and Kelly (1985) 20 A Crim R 142 R v MAK [2006] NSWCCA 381; (2006) 167 A Crim R 159 R v MMK; R v MSK [2006] NSWCCA 272; (2006) 164 A Crim R 481 R v Price [2004] NSWCCA 186 R v Reeves [2014] NSWCCA 154 R v Russell (Court of Criminal Appeal (NSW), 21 June 1996 unrep) R v Simpson [2001] NSWCCA 534, 53 NSWLR 704 R v Thomson [2000] NSWCCA 294 R v Woods [2009] NSWCCA 55 Truong v R; R v Le; Nguyen v R; R v Nguyen [2013] NSWCCA 36 Van Der Baan v The Queen [2012] NSWCCA 5 York v The Queen [2001] HCA 60; (2005) 225 CLR 46 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Regina (appellant/Crown) Representation: Counsel: P Ingram SC (appellant/Crown) G Scragg (respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate