NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Cupac v Cannone [2015] NSWCA 114 Hearing dates: 27 March 2015 Decision date: 06 May 2015 Before: Macfarlan JA at [1]; Meagher JA at [2]; Sackville AJA at [3] Decision: 1. Appeal dismissed. 2. The appellant pay the respondent's costs of the appeal. Catchwords: MOTOR ACCIDENTS COMPENSATION – assessment of damages – appellant injured in motor vehicle accident – conflicting expert medical opinions - whether primary judge erred in assessing past and future economic loss - whether primary judge erred in assessing residual earning capacity – whether error in not considering inflation rate - whether primary judge failed to provided adequate reasons Legislation Cited: Motor Accidents Compensation Act 1999 (NSW), ss 126, 131 Cases Cited: Ainsworth v Ainsworth [2002] NSWCA 130 Cupac v Cannone [2014] NSWDC 16 Larson v Commissioner of Police [2004] NSWCA 126 Majkic v Bonanno [2008] NSWCA 253 Manly Municipal Council v Skene [2002] NSWCA 385 Pettitt v Dunkley [1971] 1 NSWLR 376 State Forests of New South Wales v Dinnerville [2004] NSWCA 127 State of New South Wales v Moss [2000] NSWCA 133; 54 NSWLR 536 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Bore Cupac (Appellant) Robert Cannone (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: DE Baran (Appellant) PJ Deakin QC / J Guihot (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate