NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Penson v Titan National Pty Limited (No 2) [2015] NSWCA 120 Hearing dates: 1 May 2015 Date of orders: 01 May 2015 Decision date: 01 May 2015 Before: JC Campbell AJA Decision: Stay of judgments pending application for leave to appeal refused Catchwords: APPEALS – appeal from District Court to Court of Appeal – no right of appeal concerning statutory appeal to District Court from costs assessment review – no right of appeal concerning interlocutory orders made in District Court in statutory appeal to District Court from costs assessment review panel APPEALS – stay pending application for leave to appeal – relevant principles APPEALS – extension of time to seek leave to appeal – relevant principles Legislation Cited: District Court Act 1973, ss 127, 127(2)(a) 127(2)(c) Legal Profession Act 2004, ss 384,385 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005, rr 7.2, 36.10, 36.15, 36.16, 51.2, 51.10, 51.44 Cases Cited: Alexander v Cambridge Credit Corporation Ltd (1987) 9 NSWLR 310 Aquaqueen International Pty Ltd v Titan National Pty Ltd [2015] NSWCA 9 Blackmore v Browne; Kara Kar Holdings Pty Ltd v Blackmore [2011] NSWCA 114 Carolan v AMG Bowling Pty Ltd t/as Bennetts Green Bowl [1995] NSWCA 69 Kalifair Pty Ltd v Digi-Tech (Australia) Pty Ltd [2002] NSWCA 383; (2002) 55 NSWLR 737 Kassem v Koutavas [2012] NSWSC 236 McLean Technic Pty Ltd v Digi-Tech (Australia) Ltd [2002] NSWCA 383; (2002) 55 NSWLR 737 Muldoon v Church of England Children's Home Burwood [2011] NSWCA 46; 80 NSWLR 282 Nanschild v Pratt [2011] NSWCA 85 Riva NSW Pty Ltd v Fraser [2014] NSWCA 454 Roskott v Commonwealth Bank of Australia [2014] NSWCA 341 Tomko v Palasty (No 2) [2007] NSWCA 369; (2007) 71 NSWLR Vaughan v Dawson [2008] NSWCA 169 Zelden v Sewell [2011] NSWCA 56 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Shirley Penson (Applicant) Titan National Pty Limited (First Respondent) Kathryn Wood-Weber (Second Respondent) Representation: Counsel: In person (Applicant) C Perry (First and Second Respondents)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate