NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Shayne Hammond v Regina [2015] NSWCCA 89 Hearing dates: 24 March 2015 Date of orders: 12 May 2015 Decision date: 12 May 2015 Before: Hoeben CJ at CL at [1] Adams J at [5] McCallum J at [33] Decision: (1) Leave to appeal granted. (2) Appeal dismissed. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – appeal against sentence – aggravated sexual assault – whether error in assessment of objective seriousness and leniency Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 Criminal Appeal Act 1912 Cases Cited: Mulato v R [2006] NSWCCA 282 Ryan v R (2001) 206 CLR 267; [2001] HCA 21 Weininger v R (2003) 212 CLR 629 [2003] HCA 14 Kentwell v The Queen [2014] HCA 37 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Shayne Hammond (Applicant) The Queen (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Mr D. Barrow (Applicant) Mr K. Alder (Respondent)
Solicitors: Legal Aid of NSW (Applicant) Solicitor for Public Prosecutions (Respondent) File Number(s): 2012/96884; 2012/139927 Publication restriction: None Decision under appeal Court or tribunal: District Court of New South Wales Jurisdiction: Criminal Date of Decision: 13 December 2012 Before: McLoughlin DCJ File Number(s): 2012/96884; 2012/139927
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate