NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Davis v R [2015] NSWCCA 90 Hearing dates: 14 April 2015 Decision date: 08 May 2015 Before: Basten JA at [1]; Simpson J at [7]; Adamson J at [91] Decision: (1) The time in which to file a notice of application for leave to appeal is extended to 28 June 2013;
(2) Leave to appeal granted;
(3) Appeal allowed; sentence imposed on 14 February 2008 set aside;
(4) In lieu thereof, the applicant is sentenced to imprisonment commencing 8 November 2005, with a non-parole period of 16 years and 6 months which will expire on 7 May 2022, and a balance of term of 5 years and 6 months which will expire on 7 November 2027. Catchwords: APPEAL - sentencing - murder - "Muldrock error" - ground upheld - applicant re-sentenced
APPEAL - severity of sentence - victim's underlying heart condition not a mitigating circumstance - R v Matthews [2013] NSWSC 659 - LAL v R; RPN v R [2007] NSWSC 445 - R v Todd Munter [2009] NSWSC 158 - objective criminality of the act causing death - ground rejected - Criminal Appeal Act 1912, s 6(3) - meaning of "some other sentence is warranted in law" - obligation of Court of Criminal Appeal re-sentencing after error found - relevance sentence imposed at first instance - Kentwell v The Queen [2014] HCA 37 - applicant re-sentenced Legislation Cited: Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW), Pt 4 Div 1A, s3A, s 21A, s 54A, s 54B Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), s 19A Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW), s 6(3), s 10(1)(a) Criminal Appeal Rules, r 3B(1)(b) Cases Cited: Baxter v R [2007] NSWCCA 237; 173 A Crim R 284 Kentwell v The Queen [2014] HCA 37; 313 ALR 451 LAL v R; RPN v R [2007] NSWSC 445 Liles v R (Cth) [2014] NSWCCA 289 Muldrock v The Queen [2011] HCA 39; 244 CLR 120 Parker v Director of Public Prosecutions (1992) 28 NSWLR 282 R v Matthews [2013] NSWSC 659 R v Previtera (1997) 94 A Crim R 76 R v Simpson [2001] NSWCCA 534; 53 NSWLR 704 R v Todd Munter [2009] NSWSC 158 R v Way [2004] NSWCCA 131; 60 NSWLR 168 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Jason Russell Davis (Applicant) Regina (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: R Burgess (Applicant) G O'Rourke (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate