NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Save Little Manly Beach Foreshore Incorporated v Minister for Planning (No 3) [2015] NSWLEC 77 Hearing dates: 1, 2 December 2014 Decision date: 08 May 2015 Jurisdiction: Class 4 Before: Pain J Decision: 1. The Amended Summons filed 12 August 2014 is dismissed. 2. Costs reserved. 3. Exhibits are to be returned. Catchwords: JUDICIAL REVIEW – challenge to making of local environmental plan – whether failure to publicly exhibit amended planning proposal a breach of Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 leading to invalidity of the local environmental plan – whether misleading information contained in the publicly exhibited planning proposal – proceedings dismissed Legislation Cited: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 Pt 3 Div 4 s 53, s 54, s 55, s 56, s 57, s 58, s 59, s 73A Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 Pt 3 Div 3 s 40, s 44, s 47, s 48, s 49, s 51 (repealed) Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 Pt 3 Div 4 s 54, s 55, s 57, s 61, s 62, s 63, s 64, s 65, s 66, s 67, s 68, s 70 (repealed) Interpretation Act 1987 s 33, s 34 Local Government Act 1993 Manly Local Environmental Plan 2013 (Amendment No 1) Manly Local Environmental Plan 2013 Cases Cited: Alexander v Yass Valley Council [2011] NSWLEC 148; (2011) 184 LGERA 123 Attorney-General (NSW) v Quin (1990) 170 CLR 1 Bryan v Lane Cove Council [2007] NSWLEC 586; (2007)158 LGERA 390 DeAngelis v Pepping [2014] NSWLEC 108; (2014) 203 LGERA 61 El Cheikh v Hurstville City Council [2002] NSWCA 173; (2002) 121 LGERA 293 Friends of Turramurra Inc v Minister for Planning [2011] NSWLEC 128 John Brown Lenton & Co Pty Ltd v Minister for Urban Affairs and Planning [1999] NSWLEC 213; (1999) 106 LGERA 150 Lane v Manly Council [2009] NSWLEC 1329 Leichhardt Council v Minister for Planning [No 2] (1995) 87 LGERA 78 National Employers Mutual General Insurance v Manufacturers Mutual Insurance (1988) 17 NSWLR 223 Project Blue Sky Inc v Australian Broadcasting Authority [1998] HCA 28; (1998) 194 CLR 355 Save Little Manly Beach Foreshore Incorporated v Manly Council (No 2) [2013] NSWLEC 156 Vanmeld Pty Ltd v Fairfield City Council [1996] NSWCA 6; (1999) 46 NSWLR 78 Texts Cited: Explanatory Note (Legislation Review Committee, New South Wales Legislative Assembly, Legislative Review Digest (No 7 of 2008)) Second Reading Speech (New South Wales Legislative Council, Parliamentary Debates (Hansard), 4 June 2008, 8073) Category: Principal judgment Parties: Save Little Manly Beach Foreshore Incorporated (Applicant) Minister for Planning (First Respondent) Manly Council (Second Respondent) Tom Boyd Lane and Emma Louise Lane (Third Respondents) Representation: Counsel: Mr P Larkin SC with Ms E Whitby (Applicant) No appearance (First Respondent) Mr M Staunton with Ms J Reid (Second Respondent) No appearance (Third Respondents)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate