NSW Caselaw
Local Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Andrew Stephen Benn v State of New South Wales [2015] NSWLC 16 Hearing dates: 5 December 2014, 10 February 2015 Decision date: 14 April 2015 Jurisdiction: Civil Before: Heilpern LCM Decision: Claim dismissed Catchwords: CIVIL PROCEEDINGS – assault – plaintiff detained by police under s 22 Mental Health Act 2007 – lawful justification for police action - whether use of Taser was reasonable and not excessive Legislation Cited: Law Enforcement (Powers and Responsibilities) Act 2002, s 230 Mental Health Act 2007, ss 22, 81 Police Act 1990, s 6 Cases Cited: McIntosh v Webster (1980) 43 FLR 112 R v Ali Alkan [2010] NSWLC 1 Woodley v Boyd [2001] NSWCA 35 Williams v State of New South Wales (District Court (NSW), Blanch CDCJ, 22 February 2014, unrep) Texts Cited: NSW Ombudsman, How are Taser weapons used by the NSW Police Force? (October 2012) Category: Principal judgment Parties: Andrew Stephen Benn (plaintiff) State of New South Wales (defendant) Representation: Counsel: Mr Cochrane for the plaintiff Mr Bateman for the defendant File Number(s): 2013/295720
Judgment
Reasons for Decision 1. At the intersection of Barker Street and Walker Street in the Northern Rivers town of Casino there is a roundabout with a flagpole, a cenotaph memorial, some street signs, paving and grass. It is one of the major intersections in the town. At about 1300 on 1 October 2010 Andrew Stephen Benn (Benn) was sitting on the roundabout when he came into contact with NSW police. After a period of time he was shot with a Taser in the back by Senior Constable Reddell (Reddell). 2. Benn sues the State of New South Wales for assault, also known as battery, a species of trespass to the person.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate