NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Hohaia v R [2015] NSWCCA 91 Hearing dates: 2 April 2015 Decision date: 11 May 2015 Before: Simpson J at [1]; Harrison J at [42]; Adamson J at [43] Decision: (1) The time within which to file an application for leave to appeal extended to 28 June 2013;
(2) Leave to appeal granted;
(3) Appeal allowed, sentence imposed in respect of the charge of murder set aside;
(4) Applicant sentenced to imprisonment for 24 years commencing on 4 December 2003 and expiring on 3 December 2027, with a non-parole period of 18 years, expiring on 3 December 2021, with a balance of term of 6 years. Catchwords: APPEAL - sentencing - murder - robbery in company - "Muldrock error" - consideration of subjective circumstances and rehabilitation of applicant - appeal allowed - applicant re-sentenced Legislation Cited: Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW), Pt 4 Div 1A, s 44(2), s 54A(2), s 54B Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), s 18, s 19A(1), s 59, s 97(1) Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW), s 6(3), s 10(1)(a) Criminal Appeal Rules, r 3B(1)(b) Cases Cited: BP v R [2010] NSWCCA 159; 201 A Crim R 379 Kentwell v The Queen [2014] HCA 37; 313 ALR 451 Muldrock v The Queen [2011] HCA 39; 244 CLR 120 Parker v Director of Public Prosecutions (1992) 28 NSWLR 282 R v Way [2004] NSWCCA 131; 60 NSWLR 168 Category: Principal judgment Parties: John Hohaia (Applicant) Regina (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: B Rigg (Applicant) T Smith (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate