NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: HUDSON v ARAP 1 (NSW) PTY LTD [2015] NSWCA 126 Hearing dates: 11 March 2015 Decision date: 14 May 2015 Before: Bathurst CJ at [1]; Emmett JA at [51]; Bergin CJ in Eq at [57] Decision: Order that the decisions of the New South Wales Civil and Administrative Tribunal, in proceedings between the parties dated 1 July 2014, 21 August 2014 and 15 October 2014, be quashed. No order as to costs. Catchwords: APPEAL – New South Wales Civil and Administrative Tribunal – judicial review under s 69 of the Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW) – whether Tribunal had jurisdiction to hear an application under s 84 of the Residential Tenancies Act 2010 (NSW)
STATUTORY INTERPRETATION – plain reading – general purpose and policy - extrinsic material – prior statutory provisions – construction of s 8(1)(f) of the Residential Tenancies Act 2010 (NSW)
CONTRACT – construction – contract for sale of land - tenancy agreement – whether agreement was an agreement for the sale of land that conferred a right to occupy residential premises on a party to the agreement under s 8(1)(f) of the Residential Tenancies Act 2010 (NSW)
CONTRACT – construction – principles – implied term not to hamper performance of contract – implied term to co-operate in carrying out agreement
MORTAGAGES – common law mortgage – conveyance and option to repurchase - intention of parties – extrinsic evidence – whether agreement was agreement under a term of a mortgage that conferred a right to occupy residential premises on a party to the mortgage under s 8(1)(g) of the Residential Tenancies Act 2010 (NSW) Legislation Cited: Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW) Real Property Act 1900 (NSW) Residential Tenancies Act 1987 (NSW) Residential Tenancies Act 2010 (NSW) Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW) Cases Cited: Abigail v Lapin [1934] AC 491; 51 CLR 58 Alcan (NT) Alumina Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Territory Revenue (NT) [2009] HCA 41; 239 CLR 27 Australis Media Holdings Pty Ltd v Telstra Corporation Ltd (1998) 43 NSWLR 104 Barry v Heider [1914] HCA 79; 19 CLR 197 Barton v Bank of New South Wales (1890) 15 App Cas 379 Beckett v Tower Assets Co [1891] 1 QB 1 Certain Lloyd's Underwriters v Cross [2012] HCA 56; 248 CLR 378 Chan v Cresdon (1989) 168 CLR 242 Currey (Registrar of Titles) v The Federal Building Society [1929] HCA 28; 42 CLR 421 Figgins Holdings Pty Ltd v SEAA Enterprises Pty Ltd [1999] HCA 20; 196 CLR 245 Gurfinkel v Bentley Pty Ltd (1966) 116 CLR 98 G&C Kreglinger v New Patagonia Meat and Cold Storage Company Ltd [1914] AC 25 Mackay v Dick (1881) 6 App Cas 251 Manchester, Sheffield and Lincolnshire Railway Company v North Central Wagon Company (1888) 13 App Cas 554 Partridge v McIntosh & Sons Ltd [1933] HCA 38; 49 CLR 453 Project Blue Sky Inc v Australian Broadcasting Authority [1998] HCA 28; 194 CLR 355 Santley v Wilde [1899] 1 Ch 474 Secured Income Real Estate (Australia) Ltd v St Martins Investments Pty Ltd [1979] HCA 51; 144 CLR 596 Stirling v Maitland & Boyd (1864) 5 B&S 840 Walsh v Lonsdale (1882) 21 Ch D 9 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Geoffrey Stephen Hudson (Applicant) ARAP 1 (NSW) Pty Ltd (First Respondent) NSW Civil and Administrative Tribunal (Second Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Jean-Jacques Loofs (Applicant) M A Ashhurst SC and D G Healey (First Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate