NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Regina v Yi-Hua Jiao [2015] NSWCCA 95 Hearing dates: 6 May 2015 Date of orders: 15 May 2015 Decision date: 15 May 2015 Before: Ward JA; Johnson J; Schmidt J Decision: 1.The appeal is upheld. 2.The sentence is quashed. 3.Ms Jiao is sentenced to a term of imprisonment of 16 months commencing on 19 December 2014 and is to be released on 19 December 2015 upon Ms Jiao entering into a recognizance to be of good behaviour for a period of 4 months expiring on 18 March 2016. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – appeal – Crown appeal against sentence – federal offence – money laundering – offence under s 400.9(1) Criminal Code 1995 (Cth) –whether sentence was manifestly inadequate – objective seriousness of offence– importance of general deterrence Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1914 (Cth), ss 16A, 19AC, 20 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Bill (No. 2) 2009 (Cth) Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW), s 5D Criminal Code 1995 (Cth) ss 400.3, 400.4, 400.5, 400.6, 400.7, 400.8, 400.9, Cases Cited: Almada v R [2015] NSWCCA 19 Assafiri v R [2007] NSWCCA 159 Cahyadi v R [2007] NSWCCA 1; 168 A Crim R 41 CMB v Attorney General for New South Wales [2015] HCA 9; 317 ALR 308 Green v The Queen; Quinn v The Queen [2011] HCA 49; 244 CLR 462 Hili v The Queen; Jones v The Queen [2010] HCA 45; 242 CLR 520 Majeed v R [2013] VSCA 40 Markarian v The Queen [2005] HCA 25; 228 CLR 357 Milne v R [2012] NSWCCA 24; 259 FLR 42 Milne v The Queen [2014] HCA 4; 252 CLR 149 R v Bugmy (No 2) [2014] NSWCCA 322 R v DH; R v AH [2014] NSWCCA 326 R v Ferrer-Esis (1991) 55 A Crim R 231 R v Guo; R v Qian [2010] NSWCCA 170; 201 A Crim R 403 R v Harris [2015] NSWCCA 81 R v Hernando [2002] NSWCCA 489; 136 A Crim R 451 R v Lee [2007] NSWCCA 234 R v Li [2010] NSWCCA 125; 202 A Crim R 195 R v Milne (No 1) [2010] NSWSC 932; 260 FLR 166 R v Nguyen [2013] NSWCCA 195; 234 A Crim R 324 R v Nguyen; R v Pham [2010] NSWCCA 238; 205 A Crim R 106 Shi v R [2014] NSWCCA 276 The Queen v De Simoni [1981] HCA 31; 147 CLR 383 The Queen v Olbrich [1999] HCA 54; 199 CLR 270 Wong v The Queen; Leung v The Queen [2001] HCA 64; 207 CLR 584 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Regina (Appellant) Yi-Hua Jiao (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: RG Bromwich SC with BM Neild (Appellant) Ms M Fanning (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate