NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: James v R [2015] NSWCCA 97 Hearing dates: 1 July 2013, 8 May 2015 Date of orders: 15 May 2015 Decision date: 15 May 2015 Before: Hoeben CJ at CL at [1] Fullerton J at [1] Schmidt J at [1] Decision: Leave to appeal be allowed, but the appeal be dismissed. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW - sentence appeal - 16 offences relating to the possession and transmission of child pornography - using a carriage service to cause offence - whether sentencing judge erred in assessing objective seriousness of offences - whether sentences are manifestly excessive Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) Criminal Code Act 1995 (Cth) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010 (Cth) Cases Cited: Cargnello v Director of Public Prosecutions (Cth) [2012] NSWCCA 162 Franklin v R [2013] NSWCCA 122 Kentwell v The Queen [2014] HCA 37; 313 ALR 451 McCarthy v R [2011] NSWCCA 64 Minehan v R [2010] NSWCCA 140; 201 A Crim R 243 MPB v R [2013] NSWCCA 213 Postiglione v The Queen (1997) 189 CLR 295 R v Booth [2009] NSWCCA 89 R v De Simoni [1981] HCA 31; 147 CLR 383; 5 A Crim R 329 R v Gent [2005] NSWCCA 370; 162 A Crim R 29 R v Jarrold [2010] NSWCCA 69 R v Knight (2005) 155 A Crim R 252 at [112] and R v MAK (2006) 167 A Crim R 159 Ranguihuna v R [2105] NSWCA 48 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Paul Stephen James (Applicant) The Crown (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: A Miller (Applicant) C O'Donnell (Crown)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate