NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Finlay v Tucker [2015] NSWSC 560 Hearing dates: 13 & 14 October 2014 Date of orders: 14 May 2015 Decision date: 14 May 2015 Jurisdiction: Equity Division Before: Slattery J Decision: See paragraphs [122] - [124]. Catchwords: SUCCESSION – wills, probate and administration – construction and effect of testamentary disposition – construction of will – where executor had solely occupied estate property left to beneficiary before that beneficiary's death – whether will created a life estate or a right of residence for beneficiary – whether beneficiary was therefore responsible for expenses incurred in relation to estate property – whether payment of proceeds from sale of estate property to beneficiary authorised by will – whether alleged payments for maintenance of estate property were in fact made – whether beneficiary failed to earn income on estate property to detriment of subsequent beneficiaries – whether executor entitled to commission. Legislation Cited: Probate and Administration Act 1898, s 86 Cases Cited: Estate of JA Gilmore, deceased [2014] NSWSC 1263 Fell v Fell (1922) 31 CLR 268 Foley v Cannon (1936) 53 WN (NSW) 223 Guazzini v Pateson (1918) 18 SR (NSW) 275 Hyde v Holland [2003] NSWSC 733 In the Will of Henry Sherringham (1901) 1 SR (NSW) (B&P) 48 In the Will of James Greer (1911) 11 SR (NSW) 21 In the Will of Oddie [1976] 1 NSWLR 371 James v Commonwealth Bank of Australia (1992) 37 FCR 445 Murphy v Zamonex Pty Ltd (1993) 31 NSWLR 439 Perpetual Trustees WA Ltd v Darvell [2001] WASC 123 Re Craig (1952) 52 SR (NSW) 265 Re Estate of Lawrence (deceased) [2003] NSWSC 914 Re Estate of Wilson, deceased (1987) 11 NSWLR 493 Re Hillier, Primrose v Kewley (1939) 39 SR (NSW) 71 Re Keenan; Ford v Keenan (1914) 30 WN (NSW) 214 Wilkinson v Feldworth Financial Services Pty Ltd (1998) 29 ACSR 642 Texts Cited: RP Meagher, JD Heydon & MJ Leeming, , (4th ed 2002, LexisNexis, Butterworths). Category: Principal judgment Parties: First plaintiff: Tamara Jodie Finlay Second plaintiff: Andrew Ian Macdonald Third plaintiff: Gordon William Macdonald Fourth plaintiff: Megan Jane Magill Fifth plaintiff: Rebecca Michelle Spears Sixth plaintiff: Angela Leith Tucker Defendant: Warren Frederick Tucker Representation: Counsel: Plaintiffs: A. Scotting; Ms E. Arulrajah Defendant: M Pringle
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate