NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Lachlan v HP Mercantile Pty Ltd [2015] NSWCA 130 Hearing dates: 28 April 2015 Decision date: 15 May 2015 Before: Bathurst CJ; Beazley P; McColl JA Decision: Appeal dismissed with costs. Catchwords: CONTRACT – settlement – whether clause in deed a penalty or present debt – no express acknowledgment of present debt in deed – express acknowledgement not necessary – recitals may be used as an aid to construction – clause is not a penalty
PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – judgments and orders – consent orders – extension of time – UCPR, r 1.12 – whether Paino v Hofbauer (1988) 13 NSWLR 193 correctly decided Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) Supreme Court Rules 1970 (NSW) Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) Cases Cited: Acron Pacific Ltd v Offshore Oil NL [1985] HCA 63; 157 CLR 514 Arthur Andersen Corporate Finance Pty Ltd v Buzzle Operations Pty Ltd (in liq) [2009] NSWCA 104 Australian Management Consultants Pty Ltd v Direct Mortgage Funding Pty Ltd [2003] VSC 202Attwells v Marsden [2011] NSWSC 38 Brisbane South Regional Health Authority v Taylor [1996] HCA 25; 186 CLR 541 Calcorp (Australia) Pty Ltd v 271 Collins Pty Ltd [2010] VSCA 259 Cameron v UBS AG [2000] VSCA 222 CDJ v VAJ [1998] HCA 67; 197 CLR 172 Coulton v Holcombe [1986] HCA 33; 162 CLR 1 FAI General Insurance Company Ltd v Southern Cross Exploration NL [1988] HCA 13; 165 CLR 268 Franklins Pty Ltd v Metcash Trading Ltd [2009] NSWCA 407; 76 NSWLR 603. House v The King [1936] HCA 40; 55 CLR 499 In the matter of Prismex Technologies Pty Limited; Colin Lindsay Taggert v John Matyear [2013] NSWSC 292 Klein v Domus Pty Ltd [1963] HCA 54; 109 CLR 467 O'Dea v Allstates leasing Systems (WA) Pty Ltd [1983] HCA 3; 152 CLR 359 Paino v Hofbauer (1988) 13 NSWLR 193 Perpetual Trustee Co Ltd v Apsley Specialist Centre Pty Ltd [2010] QSC 232 Perpetual Trustee Company Ltd v Mitchell [2010] NSWSC Suttor v Gundowda Pty Ltd [1950] HCA 35; 81 CLR 418 Zenith Engineering Pty Ltd v Queensland Cane and Machinery Pty Ltd [2000] QCA 221 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Graham Lachlan (Appellant) HP Mercantile Pty Ltd (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: A Coleman SC; D Sulan (Appellant) P Knowles (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate