NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: King v R [2015] NSWCCA 99 Hearing dates: 4 May 2015 Decision date: 20 May 2015 Before: Hoeben CJ at CL at [1] Hidden J at [1] Beech-Jones J at [1] Decision: Leave to appeal granted. Appeal dismissed. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – sentence appeal – murder – victim beaten to death by boyfriend in her apartment – applicant intoxicated by ice at time – whether adequate attention given to rehabilitation in sentence – finding of poor prospects of rehabilitation open on evidence – no error in judge's refusal to find special circumstances – whether intoxication by ice an aggravating feature – whether principle of totality observed – whether sentence manifestly excessive – grounds of appeal not made out – appeal dismissed. Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 – ss 18(1)(a), 35(2), 59(1) Cases Cited: Dinsdale v R [2000] HCA 54; 202 CLR 321 House v R [1936] HCA 40; 55 CLR 499 Ma and Pham v R [2007] NSWCCA 240 Markarian v R [2005] HCA 25; 228 CLR 357 Mill v R [1988] HCA 70; 166 CLR 59 Postiglione v R [1997] HCA 26; 189 CLR 295 R v Cimone [2001] NSWCCA 98; 121 A Crim R 433 R v Gittany [2014] NSWSC 49 R v Kennedy [2013] NSWSC 1940 R v Ray [2013] NSWSC 767 R v Richardson [2012] NSWSC 521 R v Vuni [2006] NSWCCA 171 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Sean Lee King – Applicant Regina – Respondent Crown Representation: Counsel: Dr R Webb – Applicant Mr N Adams – Respondent Crown
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate