NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Zangana v R (Cth) [2015] NSWCCA 102 Hearing dates: 26 March 2015 Decision date: 20 May 2015 Before: Hoeben CJ at CL at [1] Adams J at [105] McCallum J at [106] Decision: Leave to appeal granted. Appeal dismissed. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – sentence appeal – offences contrary to s233A of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) facilitating the bringing or coming to Australia of a non-citizen person – whether error in inference drawn by sentencing judge – whether evidence sufficient to establish beyond reasonable doubt that offender was in part motivated by financial gain – despite error in reasoning, conclusion of sentencing judge correct – alternatively no lesser sentence warranted in law – appeal dismissed. Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1914 (Cth) – s16BA Migration Act 1958 (Cth) – s233A Cases Cited: Farkas v R [2014] NSWCCA 141 Ishac v R [2011] NSWCCA 107 Kentwell v The Queen [2014] HCA 37; 313 ALR 451 Khanwaiz v R [2012] NSWCCA 168 Muldrock v R [2011] HCA 39; 244 CLR 120 R v Michael Arthur Falls [2004] NSWCCA 335 R v Feng Lin [2001] NSWCCA 7; 119 A Crim R 194 Zammit v R [2010] NSWCCA 29 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Fadhil Raghib Khana Zangana – Applicant Regina (Cth) – Respondent Crown Representation: Counsel: Ms J Hickleton – Applicant Mr P McGuire - Respondent
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate