NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Voelte v Australian Broadcasting Corporation (No 2) [2015] NSWSC 577 Hearing dates: 24 April 2015 Date of orders: 24 April 2015 Decision date: 24 April 2015 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: McCallum J Decision: Contextual imputations A, B and C struck out. Catchwords: DEFAMATION – procedure – pleadings – defences – contextual imputations – requirement of specificity – consideration of Mizikovsky v Queensland Television Ltd regarding directions to jury as to contextual truth defence Legislation Cited: Defamation Act 2005 (NSW), s 26 Cases Cited: King v Fairfax Media Publications (No 2) [2014] NSWSC 1244 McMahon v John Fairfax Publications Pty Limited (No 3) [2012] NSWSC 196 McMahon v John Fairfax Publications Pty Limited (No 6) [2012] NSWSC 224 Mizikovsky v. Queensland Television Limited ACN 009 674 373 and Ors [2014] HCATrans 21 Mizikovsky v Queensland Television Limited & Ors [2013] QCA 68 Mizikovsky v Queensland Television Ltd & Ors (No 3) [2011] QSC 375 Rigby v John Fairfax Group Pty Ltd (Court of Appeal (NSW), 1 February 1996, unrep) Voelte v Australian Broadcasting Corporation [2015] NSWSC 210 Whelan v John Fairfax & Sons Ltd [1988] 12 NSWLR 148 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Don Voelte (Plaintiff) Australian Broadcasting Corporation (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: R Jedrzejczyk (Plaintiff) S Littlemore QC with M Polden (Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate