NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Environment Protection Authority v Sydney Water Corporation [2015] NSWLEC 80 Hearing dates: 13 and 21 April 2015 Date of orders: 21 April 2015 Decision date: 21 April 2015 Jurisdiction: Class 5 Before: Preston CJ Decision: Orders as set out at [131] and [132] Catchwords: OFFENCES AND PENALTIES – sentence – pollution of waters – failure to comply with licence condition to maintain plant and equipment in proper and efficient condition – objective seriousness of offences – environmental harm caused was substantial – foreseeability of risk of environmental harm – practical measures to avoid environmental harm not taken – control over causes giving rise to the offences – offences not committed with heightened state of mind or for financial gain – low to moderate overall objective seriousness – subjective circumstances of offender – record of prior convictions not aggravating factor – early pleas of guilty – offender's genuine remorse for the offences – offender of good corporate character – offender unlikely to reoffend – offender cooperated with authorities – totality principle applies – two offences caused by the same conduct – no overlap of the external or physical elements of the offences – areas of overlap of aggravation in commission of offences – appropriate to adjust sentences to avoid double punishment and take into account specific circumstances of aggravation Legislation Cited: Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 ss 3A, 21A(2) Criminal Procedure Act 1986 ss 257B, 257G Environmental Trust Act 1998 s 7 Protection of the Environment Operations Act 1997 ss 64(1),(2), 120(1), 241(1), 250(1) Sydney Water Act 1994 ss 21(1)(b), 22 Cases Cited: Environment Protection Authority v Orica Australia Pty Ltd (the Nitric Acid Air Lift Incident) [2014] NSWLEC 103; (2014) 206 LGERA 239 Environment Protection Authority v Sydney Water Corporation Ltd (1996) 93 LGERA 43 Environment Protection Authority v Sydney Water Corporation Ltd [1999] NSWLEC 60; (1999) 102 LGERA 232 Environment Protection Authority v Sydney Water Corporation [2000] NSWLEC 80 Environment Protection Authority v Sydney Water Corporation [2000] NSWLEC 156 Environment Protection Authority v Waste Recycling and Processing Corporation [2006] NSWLEC 419; (2006) 148 LGERA 299 Pearce v The Queen [1998] HCA 57; (1998) 194 CLR 610 R v McNaughton [2006] NSWCCA 242; (2006) 66 NSWLR 566 Veen v The Queen (No 2) [1988] HCA 14; (1988) 164 CLR 465 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Environment Protection Authority (Prosecutor) Sydney Water Corporation (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: Mr N Allen (Solicitor) (Prosecutor) Mr J Johnson (Barrister) (Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate