NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Phoenician Holdings Pty Ltd t/as Cadmus Lawyers v Rahme [2015] NSWSC 587 Hearing dates: 30 April, 5 and 7 May 2015 Date of orders: 19 May 2015 Decision date: 19 May 2015 Jurisdiction: Equity Division Before: Robb J Decision: (1) I order that the defendants' notice of motion filed on 7 April 2015 is dismissed.
(2) I order the defendants to pay the plaintiff's costs of the notice of motion.
(3) I order that the exhibits may be returned forthwith in accordance with the Rules. Catchwords: EQUITY – mortgages – plaintiff was defendants' solicitor – deed of charge executed to secure payment of costs and disbursements payable to plaintiff – defendants executed a mortgage under the Real Property Act 1900 (NSW) in favour of plaintiff, as mortgagees, in respect of such costs – property was sold and the Court ordered an amount be paid by defendants into a controlled monies account – defendants seeks to have a portion of the controlled monies be withdrawn for purpose of defending their other unrelated legal proceeding – plaintiff's right to security under the deed could be jeopardised if paid out to defendants – cannot be excluded that plaintiff may be able to substantiate its costs claims against the defendants – defendants have not sufficiently established that they are unable to fund their defence from other sources – difficult for the Court in interlocutory proceedings to reduce the value of the security Legislation Cited: Contracts Review Act 1980 (NSW) Legal Profession Act 2004 (NSW) Real Property Act 1900 (NSW) Cases Cited: Clarke v Japan Machines (Australia) Pty Ltd (No 2) [1984] 1 Qd R 421 Goater v Commonwealth Bank of Australia [2014] NSWCA 265 Inglis v The Commonwealth Trading Bank of Australia (1972) 126 CLR 161 Macleod v Jones (1883) 24 Ch D 289 Nemeth v Reachcord Pty Ltd (1998) 9 BPR 16,557 Phoenician Holdings Pty Ltd t/as Cadmus Lawyers v Rahme [2012] NSWSC 1604 Phoenician Holdings Pty Ltd t/as Cadmus Lawyers v Rahme [2013] NSWSC 174 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Phoenician Holdings Pty Ltd T/as Cadmus Lawyers (Plaintiff/Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate