NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: RL v R [2015] NSWCCA 106 Hearing dates: 14 April 2015 Decision date: 22 May 2015 Before: Basten JA; Simpson J; Adamson J Decision: (1)Grant the applicant leave to appeal.
(2)Allow the appeal and set aside the sentence imposed by the sentencing judge on 14 February 2014.
(3)Resentence the applicant to imprisonment for 6 years, with a non-parole period of 2 years 9 months to date from 14 February 2014 and a balance of term of 3 years 3 months.
(4)The first date on which the applicant is eligible for parole is 13 November 2016. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – sentencing – sentencing adult for sexual offences committed as juvenile – whether sufficient allowance made for applicant's youth at time of offending – whether sentence accorded with sentencing principles applied at time of offending – no need for further rehabilitation
CRIMINAL LAW – sentencing – whether planning of type which aggravates offence pursuant to s 21A(2)(n), Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW)
CRIMINAL LAW – sentencing – use of victim impact statement – statement not limited to harm directly resulting from offence
CRIMINAL LAW – sentencing – whether to consider ground of manifest excess if specific error established – need for appeal court to determine appropriate sentence – not sufficient to ask if impugned sentence within range – Kentwell v The Queen [2014] HCA 37 applied – Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW), s 6(3) Legislation Cited: Child Welfare Act 1939 (NSW), s 83 Children (Criminal Proceedings) Act 1987 (NSW), s 33 Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), ss 61D(1), 71, 76, 81 Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW), ss 21A, 26, 28, 32, 44, 53A Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW), s 6 Cases Cited: Abbas v R [2013] NSWCCA 115; 231 A Crim R 413 AJB v R [2014] NSWCCA 51; 169 A Crim R 32 Davis v R [2015] NSWCCA 90 Fahs v R [2007] NSWCCA 26 Kentwell v The Queen [2014] HCA 37; 88 ALJR 947 MPB v R [2013] NSWCCA 213; 234 A Crim R 576 R v Moon [2000] NSWCCA 534; 117 A Crim R 497 R v Tuala [2015] NSWCCA 8 Williams v R [2010] NSWCCA 15 Category: Principal judgment Parties: RL (Applicant) Regina (Crown) Representation: Counsel: W Hunt (Applicant) G O'Rourke (Crown)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate