NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Allen v R [2015] NSWCCA 113 Hearing dates: 20 May 2015 Decision date: 27 May 2015 Before: Hoeben CJ at CL at [1] R A Hulme J at [42] Beech-Jones J at [43] Decision: Leave to appeal granted. Appeal dismissed. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – sentence appeal – demand money with menaces and assault with intent to rob while armed with an offensive weapon – whether sentencing judge should have found "special circumstances" – discretionary finding of fact – no "House v R" error – appeal dismissed. Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 – s 97(1), s 99 Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 Cases Cited: Caristo v R [2011] NSWCCA 7 House v R [1936] HCA 40; 55 CLR 499 Jayde Farrell v R [2012] NSWCCA 245 Jiang v R [2010] NSWCCA 277 MD v R [2015] NSWCCA 37 PK v R [2012] NSWCCA 263 Power v R [1974] HCA 26; 131 CLR 623 R v Carter [2003] NSWCCA 243 R v Cramp [2004] NSWCCA 264 R v Fidow [2004] NSWCCA 172 R v GWM [2012] NSWCCA 240 R v Henry [1999] NSWCCA 111; 46 NSWLR 346 R v Sellars [2010] NSWCCA 133 R v Simpson [2001] NSWCCA 534; 53 NSWLR 704 R v Tuuta [2014] NSWCCA 40 Trad v R [2009] NSWCCA 56; 194 A Crim R 20 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Rhys James Allen – Applicant Regina – Respondent Crown Representation: Counsel: Applicant in person S Dowling SC – Respondent Crown
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate