NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Pola v Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Limited [2015] NSWCA 146 Hearing dates: 3 March 2015 Date of orders: 27 May 2015 Decision date: 27 May 2015 Before: Bathurst CJ at [1]; Bergin CJ in Eq at [3]; Young AJA at [152] Decision: The Appeal is dismissed. The Cross-Appeal is dismissed. The appellants are to pay the Bank's costs of the Appeal. The Bank is to pay the appellants' costs of the Cross-Appeal. Catchwords: REAL PROPERTY – mortgagee's duty in exercising power of sale – whether mortgagee failed to discharge its duty under s 85(1) of the Property Law Act 1974 (Qld) – whether failure to refer to valuable water allocation relating to the Property in advertisements for sale was a breach of duty
APPEAL – whether primary judge correctly assessed market value of the Property – whether primary judge correctly reduced judgment for the mortgagee by amount awarded on cross-claim of mortgagors – whether primary judge correctly exercised discretion as to costs Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) Property Law Act 1974 (Qld) Water Act 2000 (Qld) Cases Cited: ACES Sogutlu Holdings Pty Ltd v Commonwealth Bank of Australia [2014] NSWCA 402 Commercial and General Acceptance Limited v Nixon (1981) 152 CLR 491 Emerson v Custom Credit Corporation Ltd (1991) Q ConvR ¶54-414 Emerson v Custom Credit Corporation Ltd [1994] 1 Qd R 516 Florgale Uniforms Pty Ltd v Orders (2004) 11 VR 54 Glodale Pty Ltd v Investec Bank (Australia) Ltd [2007] VSC 276 Higton Enterprises Pty Ltd v BFC Finance Limited [1997] 1 Qd R 168 Investec Bank (Australia) Ltd v Glodale Pty Ltd [2009] VSCA 97; 24 VR 617 Jovanovic v Commonwealth Bank of Australia (2004) 87 SASR 570 McKean v Maloney [1988] 1 Qd R 628 Munya Lake Pty Ltd v Chief Executive, Dept of Natural Resources and Water [2010] QSC 58 Omlaw Pty Ltd v Delahunty [1995] 2 Qd R 389 Pendlebury v Colonial Mutual Life Assurance Society Ltd [1912] HCA 9; 13 CLR 676 Sablebrook Pty Ltd v Credit Union Australia Ltd [2008] QSC 242 Spencer v Commonwealth of Australia (1907) 5 CLR 418 Ultimate Property Group Pty Ltd v Lord (2004) 60 NSWLR 646 Texts Cited: Rory Derham, The Law of Set-Off, (4th ed 2010, Oxford University Press) Category: Principal judgment Parties: Laurence James Pola/Silvia Frances Pola (Appellants/Cross-Respondents) Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Limited (Respondent/Cross-Appellant) Representation: Counsel: P Hargreaves (Solicitor) (Appellants/Cross- Respondents) CRC Newlinds SC/G Lucarelli (Respondent/Cross-Appellant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate