NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Australian Institute of Fitness Pty Limited v Australian Institute of Fitness (Vic/Tas) Pty Limited [2015] NSWSC 635 Hearing dates: 1 May 2015 Date of orders: 01 May 2015 Decision date: 26 May 2015 Before: Sackar J Decision: See [43] Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – proceedings heard together – evidence in one proceeding evidence in the others – application to limit use of evidence – cross examination – restrictions on cross examination – unfair prejudice
PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application to vary orders – circumstances where variation appropriate – forensic strategy Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) Cases Cited: Fulham Partners LLC v National Australia Bank Ltd [2013] NSWCA 296 Papakosmas v The Queen (1999) 196 CLR 297 Paras v Public Service Body Head of the Department of Infrastructure (No 2) (2006) 152 IR 352; [2006] FCA 652 Prentice v Cummins (2003) 134 FCR 449 Quick v Stoland Pty Ltd (1998) 87 FCR 371 R v Em [2003] NSWCCA 374 R v Fernando [1999] NSWCCA 66 R v Swaffield (1998) 192 CLR 159 Re Quartz Hill & Co; Ex parte Young (1882) 21 Ch D 642 Roach v Page (No 11) [2003] NSWSC 907 Seven Network Ltd v News Ltd (No 8) [2005] FCA 1348 Texts Cited: Australian Law Reform Commission, Uniform Evidence Law (Report 102, 2006) Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: 2014/85141 (Licence Fee Proceedings)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate