NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Halac v R [2015] NSWCCA 121 Hearing dates: 22 April 2015 Date of orders: 01 June 2015 Decision date: 01 June 2015 Before: Hoeben CJ at CL at [1] Hall J at [2] Garling J at [3] Decision: (1)Leave to appeal granted. (2)Appeal dismissed. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – appeal – sentence – whether judge erred in taking into account quantity of drugs located after applicant's arrest – CRIMINAL LAW – appeal – sentence – whether judge erred in assessing applicant's role in drug syndicate – parity – whether error in assessment of applicant's role compared to other members in syndicate – CRIMINAL LAW – appeal – sentence – whether error in rejecting statement made by applicant to expert – no sworn evidence of applicant – limited weight given to untested, self-serving statements made to experts Legislation Cited: Criminal Code (Cth) Cases Cited: House v R [1936] HCA 40; (1936) 55 CLR 499 Mulato v R [2006] NSWCCA 282 R v KB [2011] NSWCCA 190 R v Qutami [2001] NSWCCA 353 Texts Cited: Not Applicable Category: Principal judgment Parties: The Queen Sven Halac (Offender) Representation: Counsel: DG Staehli SC(Crown) W Abraham QC (Offender)
Solicitors: Crown Solicitor's Office Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions (Offender) File Number(s): 2011/131602 Publication restriction: Not Applicable Decision under appeal Court or tribunal: District Court of NSW Jurisdiction: Criminal Date of Decision: 21 February 2014 Before: Hock DCJ File Number(s): 2011/131602
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate