NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Chen v R [2015] NSWCCA 122 Hearing dates: 23 March 2015 Decision date: 29 May 2015 Before: R A Hulme J at [1]; Davies J at [82]; Bellew J at [83] Decision: 1. Leave to appeal against conviction granted. 2. Appeal dismissed. 3. Leave to appeal against sentence refused. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – appeal against conviction – obtaining a benefit by deception – attempt to obtain a benefit by deception – Criminal Code ss 134.2, 11.1 – whether trial judge erred in giving consciousness of guilt direction – potential for circular reasoning – consciousness of guilt direction not necessary – error established – no risk jury would engage in improper reasoning process – no substantial miscarriage of justice – appeal dismissed
CRIMINAL LAW – appeal against sentence – obtaining a benefit by deception – attempt to obtain a benefit by deception – whether error in assessment of objective seriousness – reference to involvement of innocent third parties – where offences part of an elaborate scheme of fraud – no error established – leave to appeal refused Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1914 (Cth) s 16A(2) Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW) Criminal Appeal Rules r 4 Criminal Code (Cth) ss 11.1, 134.2 Cases Cited: Edwards v The Queen [1993] HCA 63; 178 CLR 193 Gall v R; Gall v R [2015] NSWCCA 69 R v Lane (No 13) [2010] NSWSC 1540 R v Lane [2011] NSWCCA 157; 221 A Crim R 309 R v Laz [1998] 1 VR 453 R v Lucas (1981) 1 QB 720 R v Mercer (1993) 67 A Crim R 91 R v Sirillas [2006] VSCA 234 R v Wang, (Court of Criminal Appeal (NSW), 11 February 1994, unrep) R v Zheng (1995) 83 A Crim R 572 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Julian Chen (Applicant) Regina (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Mr P Lange (Applicant) Mr C O'Donnell (Crown)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate