NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Elddin v Hamed (No 2) [2015] NSWSC 654 Hearing dates: 29 October 2014, 10-11 November 2014 Decision date: 29 May 2015 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Button J Decision: (1) The plaintiff is entitled to exclusive possession of the property. (2) The plaintiff has leave to issue a writ of possession two weeks from today; namely, on 12 June 2015. (3) The second defendant must pay the costs of the plaintiff of the proceedings before me. Catchwords: REAL PROPERTY – whether owner of residential premises is entitled to possession as against the occupants of those premises – whether occupants are estopped from relying on s 119 of the Residential Tenancies Act 2010 (NSW) – whether payments made to owner were loans or contribution to purchase price – whether a resulting or constructive trust has arisen in favour of one or more occupants Legislation Cited: Residential Tenancies Act 2010 (NSW) ss 13, 119 Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW), s 75 Cases Cited: Calverley v Green [1984] HCA 81; 155 CLR 242 Celermajer Holdings Pty Ltd v Kopas [2011] NSWSC 40 Muschinski v Dodds [1985] HCA 78; 160 CLR 583 Official Trustee in Bankruptcy v Tooheys Ltd (1993) 29 NSWLR 641 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Moustafa Kamar Elddin (Plaintiff) Mohamed Hamed (First Defendant) Rina Hamed (Second Defendant) Representation: Counsel: C P O'Neill (Plaintiff) P Lange (Defendants)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate