NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Rodrigo v Zhang (No 2) [2015] NSWCATAP 101 Hearing dates: 14 January 2015 Date of orders: 01 June 2015 Decision date: 01 June 2015 Jurisdiction: Appeal Panel Before: M Harrowell, Principal Member S Higgins, Principal Member Decision: 1. Leave to appeal is refused 2. The appeal is otherwise dismissed 3. No order as to costs Catchwords: RESIDENTIAL Tenancy - leave to appeal – whether the appellant established that he suffered a substantial miscarriage of justice because the decision under appeal was not fair and equitable and or the decision was against the weight of evidence – validity of appellant's notice pursuant to s98 of the Residential Tenancies Act, 2010 Termination under s81(2) of the Residential Tenancies Act, 2010 without order of Tribunal. Legislation Cited: Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act, 2013 Residential Tenancies Act, 2010 Cases Cited: Khan v Kang [2014] NSWCATAP 48 Rodrigo v Zhang [2014] NSWCATAP 92 Urban v Collins [2014] NSWCATAP 17 Texts Cited: Nil Category: Principal judgment Parties: Appellant: Shane Rodrigo Respondent: Zooey Zhang Representation: Counsel: Not applicable
Solicitors: Not applicable File Number(s): AP 14/46309 Publication restriction: Unrestricted Decision under appeal Court or tribunal: Civil and Administrative Tribunal of New South Wales, Jurisdiction: Consumer and Commercial Division Citation: Not applicable Date of Decision: 21 February 2014 Before: D Charles, General Member File Number(s): RT 13/58731
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate