NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Allianz Australia Insurance Ltd v Gonzalez (No 2) [2015] NSWSC 693 Hearing dates: 1 June 2015 Date of orders: 05 June 2015 Decision date: 05 June 2015 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Campbell J Decision: I make the following orders: Dissolve the interim order made on 20th November 2014 restraining the then second and third defendants from proceeding with a further medical assessment; Amend the record so the only defendants are described as, Carmen Ruth Gonzalez as first defendant; the Motor Accidents Claims Assessment and Resolution Service as second defendant; and the Proper Officer of the Motor Accidents Authority of New South Wales as third defendant; The proceedings are dismissed; The plaintiff to pay the first defendant's costs of and incidental to the proceedings, on the ordinary basis forthwith after they have been agreed or assessed. Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – judicial review – motor accident damages – decision of claims assessor – whether infected by jurisdictional error – whether the claims assessor took into account an irrelevant consideration or failed to take into account a relevant consideration – whether referral was "grossly illogical" – whether error of law
TRAFFIC LAW – Motor Accidents Compensation Act 1999 – motor accident damages – where claimant "bullied" following motor vehicle collision – referral to proper officer under s 62(1)(b) for reassessment by claims assessor – where claims assessor wrote letter outlining background and posing questions for proper officer to answer Legislation Cited: Civil Liability Act 2002 (NSW); Motor Accidents Compensation Act 1999 (NSW) Cases Cited: Allianz Australia Insurance Limited v Gonzalez [2013] NSWSC 362; Allianz Australia Insurance Limited v GSF Australia Pty Ltd [2005] HCA 26; 221 CLR 568; Buck v Bavone [1976] HCA 24; 135 CLR 110; Campbelltown City Council v Vegan [2006] NSWCA 284; Foley v Padley (1983) 154 CLR 349 Hot Holdings Pty Ltd v Creasey [1986] HCA 44; 185 CLR 149; House v The King (1936) 55 CLR 499; Miles v Motor Accidents Authority of New South Wales [2013] NSWSC 927; 84 NSWLR 632; Minister for Aboriginal Affairs & Anor v Peko-Wallsend Ltd & Ors [1986] HCA 40; 162 CLR 24; Minister for Immigration & Citizenship v Li [2013] HCA 18; 249 CLR 332; Motor Accidents Authority of New South Wales v Mills [2010] NSWCA 82; 78 NSWLR 125; Nominal Defendant v Hawkins [2011] NSWCA 93; 58 MVR 362; Peet v NRMA Insurance Ltd [2015] NSWSC 558; Rodger v De Gelder [2011] NSWCA 97; 80 NSWLR 594; Ryder v Sundance Bakehouse [2015] NSWSC 526; Swan Hill Corporation v Bradbury (1937) 56 CLR 746; Trazivuk v Motor Accidents Authority of New South Wales [2010] NSWCA 287; 57 MVR 9 Texts Cited: Motor Accidents Authority - Medical Assessment Guidelines Category: Principal judgment Parties: Allianz Australia Insurance Ltd (Plaintiff) Carmen Ruth Gonzalez (First Defendant) Representation: Counsel: K.P. Rewell SC (Plaintiff) M.A. Robinson SC with J Gumbert (First Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate