Mayo v W & K Holdings (NSW) Pty Ltd (in liq) (No 3) [2015] NSWCA 155

Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Mayo v W & K Holdings (NSW) Pty Ltd (in liq) (No 3) [2015] NSWCA 155 Hearing dates: On the papers Decision date: 09 June 2015 Before: Meagher JA; Gleeson JA; Sackville AJA Decision: (1) In addition to the orders made on 8 May 2015:

(a) Judgment for the appellant against the respondents in the sum of $5,412.36.

(b) This judgment takes effect on 8 May 2015. Catchwords: PROCEDURE – judgment and orders – prejudgment interest Legislation Cited: Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) r 36.4 Category: Consequential orders (other than Costs) Parties: Laureen Margaret Mayo (Appellant) W & K Holdings (NSW) Pty Ltd (in liq) (First respondent) William Arthur Leonard (Second respondent) Representation: Counsel: H Stowe (Appellant) D Allen (Second respondent)

Solicitors: Mason Lawyers (Appellant) Catalyst Legal (Second respondent) File Number(s): 2013/332269 Decision under appeal Court or tribunal: Supreme Court Jurisdiction: Equity Citation: [2013] NSWSC 1063 Date of Decision: 09 August 2013 Before: Sackar J File Number(s): 2009/289575

[Note: The Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 provide (Rule 36.11) that unless the Court otherwise orders, a judgment or order is taken to be entered when it is recorded in the Court's computerised court record system. Setting aside and variation of judgments or orders is dealt with by Rules 36.15, 36.16, 36.17 and 36.18. Parties should in particular note the time limit of fourteen days in Rule 36.16.]