NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: James Estate Wines Pty Ltd v Rabobank Australia Limited [2015] NSWSC 712 Hearing dates: 3 June 2015 Date of orders: 04 June 2015 Decision date: 04 June 2015 Jurisdiction: Equity Division Before: Young AJA Decision: See [41] Catchwords: REAL PROPERTY – Torrens system – whether caveatable interest – failure to state quantum of equitable interest claimed AGRICULTURE – share farming agreement – the rights to grow crops – not a profit à prendre – mere licence – no interest in land
CONTRACT – false label – parties' statement that farmer has a caveatable interest in the land not conclusive Legislation Cited: Agricultural Tenancy Act 1990 Farm Debt Mediation Act 1994 Interpretation Act 1987, s76 Real Property Act 1900, s43A Cases Cited: Alonso v Leichhardt Municipal Council [1975] 1 BPR 9,368 Circuit Finance Pty Limited v Crown and Gleeson Securities Pty Limited (2005) 12 BPR 23,403 Clos Farming Estate Pty Limited v Easton [2002] NSWSC 389; 11 BPR 20,605 Complex Scaffolding Solutions Pty Limited v Doueihi (2914) 17 BPR 33,753 Corporate Affairs Commissioner v ASC Timber Pty Limited 91989) 18 NSW 577 Cowell v Rosehill Racecourse Co Limited [1937] HCA 17; (1937) 56 CLR 605 Deputy Commissioner of Taxation v Barroleg (1997) 25 ACSR 167 Dudgeon v Chie (1954) 55 SR (NSW) 450 Dudgeon v Chie [1955] HCA 42; (1955) 92 CLR 342 Hanson Construction Materials Pty Limited v Vimwise Civil Engineering Pty Limited (2005) 12 BPR 23,355 Hindmarsh v Quinn [1914] HCA 27; 17 CLR 622 Texts Cited: Assaf, F, Statutory Demands and Winding Up in Insolvency (2nd Edition Butterworths 2012) Glanville Williams, Joint Obligations (Butterworths 1949) Lewison & Hughes, Interpretation of Contracts in Australia (Law Book Company 2012) Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: David James – applicant James Estate Wines Pty Ltd (Receivers and Managers appointed) – plaintiff Rabobank Australia Limited – first defendant Representation: Counsel: J Baird – for the applicant and plaintiff S Lipp – for the first defendant F Assaf – for the second defendant
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate