Bardsley-Smith v Penrith City Council (No 2) [2015] NSWLEC 94

Land and Environment Court New South Wales

Medium Neutral Citation: Bardsley-Smith v Penrith City Council (No 2) [2015] NSWLEC 94 Hearing dates: 18 September, 27 September, and 13 December 2013; 1 April, 8 May, 23 June, and 21 July 2014; eCourt 29 August and 3 October 2014; 17 November 2014, 15 December 2014, 3 February 2015, 13 May 2015 Date of orders: 12 June 2015 Decision date: 12 June 2015 Jurisdiction: Class 4 Before: Sheahan J Decision: See orders in [125] Catchwords: INJUNCTIONS AND DECLARATIONS – Determination of final relief on remitter – Court of Appeal determined that the challenged consent authorised only the sale of specified pharmaceutical items directly to the public, and, therefore, the respondents' use of the site for a large scale retail pharmacy was in breach of that consent – subsequent grant of consent for the use of the site as a "neighbourhood shop" – whether subsequent consent rendered futile the making of a declaration and granting of an injunction reflecting the findings of the Court of Appeal.

COSTS – Applicants successful in their appeal on some grounds not argued at first instance – whether the applicants are entitled to a costs order in their favour in respect of the first instance proceedings. Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 Land and Environment Court Act 1979 National Health Act 1953 (Cth) Penrith Local Environmental Plan 2010 Penrith Local Environmental Plan (Industrial Land) 1996 Poisons and Therapeutic Goods Act 1966 Therapeutic Goods Regulations 1990 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 Cases Cited: Administration and Marketing Solutions Pty Ltd v Bardsley-Smith [2014] HCA Trans 59 Bardsley-Smith v Penrith City Council [2012] NSWLEC 79; 189 LGERA 130 Bardsley-Smith v Penrith City Council [2013] NSWCA 200; 195 LGERA 34 Bardsley-Smith v Penrith City Council (No 2) [2013] NSWCA 284 Brown v Randwick City Council (No 2) [2012] NSWLEC 28 Calardu Warrawong (Homestarters) Pty Limited v Wollongong City Council (No 2) [2010] NSWLEC 26 Chamwell Pty Ltd v Strathfield Council [2007] NSWLEC 114; 151 LGERA 400 Dodds Family Investments Pty Ltd v Lane Industries Pty Ltd (1993) 26 IPR 261 Great Lakes Council v Lani [2007] NSWLEC 681; 158 LGERA 1 Greenwood v Warringah Council (No 2) [2013] NSWLEC 3; 196 LGERA 28 Hoxton Park Residents Action Group Inc v Liverpool City Council (No 3) [2012] NSWLEC 43; 190 LGERA 119 Hughes v Western Australian Cricket Association (Inc) [1986] FCA 382; (1986) ATPR 40-748 James v Surf Road Nominees Pty Limited (No. 2) [2005] NSWCA 296 Liverpool City Council v Roads and Traffic Authority (No 2) (1992) 75 LGRA 210 Madden v Connell [2001] NSWSC 1051 Macquarie International Health Clinic Pty Ltd v University of Sydney (1998) 98 LGERA 218 Permanent Trustee Aust Ltd v FAI General Insurance Co Ltd (unreported, NSWSC, 3 June 1998) Pittwater Council v Bolitho [2007] NSWLEC 355 Tomanovic v Global Mortgage Equity Corporation Pty Ltd (No 2) [2011] NSWCA 256; 288 ALR 385 Waters v. P C Henderson (Aust) Pty. Limited (unreported CA(NSW) Kirby P, Mahoney and Priestley JJA, 6 July 1994) Woolworths Ltd v Pallas Newco Pty Ltd [2004] NSWCA 422; 61 NSWLR 707 Texts Cited: G.E. Dalpont, "Law of Costs", 2nd ed. Category: Consequential orders (other than Costs) Parties: Janis Margaret Bardsley-Smith (First Applicant) Ian Patrick Stubbs (Third Applicant) Penrith City Council (First Respondent) Administration and Marketing Solutions Pty Limited (Second Respondent) Damien Michael Gance (Third Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Mr J Robson SC with Mr C Ireland (Applicants) Submitting (First Respondent) Mr A Galasso SC with Mr N Eastman (Second and Third Respondents)