NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Cappis v R [2015] NSWCCA 138 Hearing dates: 1 June 2015 Date of orders: 12 June 2015 Decision date: 12 June 2015 Before: Gleeson JA at [1] Johnson J at [2] Garling J at [3] Decision: (1)Application for leave to appeal granted. (2)Appeal dismissed. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – appeal – sentence – self represented appellant – whether error in discount for early plea – no offender has an entitlement to a particular discount – CRIMINAL LAW – appeal – sentence – whether Judge erred in concluding a conviction was inevitable – Crown case compelling – open for sentencing Judge to conclude conviction inevitable – CRIMINAL LAW – appeal – sentence – whether bad legal advice – no bad legal advice – CRIMINAL LAW – appeal – sentence – whether error that no further discount for compassionate grounds – appellant a Canadian national – that appellant a foreigner of strictly limited significance – intentionally visited Australia to commit crime Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1914 (Cth) Criminal Code 1995 Cases Cited: Danial v R [2008] NSWCCA 15 R v Ferrer-Esis (1991) 55 A Crim R 231 Trujillo-Mesa v R [2010] NSWCCA 201 Tyler v R; R v Chalmers [2007] NSWCCA 247; 173 A Crim R 458 Texts Cited: Not Applicable Category: Principal judgment Parties: Shawn Jason Cappis (Applicant) Regina Representation: Counsel: Self Represented (Applicant) T Anderson (Crown)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate