NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Kumar v Legal Services Commissioner [2015] NSWCA 161 Hearing dates: 7 April 2015 Decision date: 17 June 2015 Before: Basten JA at [1]; Leeming JA at [2]; Sackville AJA at [117] Decision: Appeal dismissed, with costs. Catchwords: LEGAL PRACTITIONERS - disciplinary proceedings - solicitor removed from Roll for dishonest misappropriation of client's money and obstructing Legal Services Commissioner - whether Tribunal considered solicitor's case that the misappropriation was a mistake - finding of deliberate dishonesty upheld - whether Tribunal had failed to apply Briginshaw standard - whether solicitor was denied procedural fairness in not being permitted to issue further subpoenas - whether solicitor had reasonable excuse for hindering and delaying Commissioner's investigation - whether Commissioner's application in the Tribunal was duplicitous - whether s 674 of Legal Profession Act 2004 (NSW) created a single offence or two offences - whether each class of conduct alleged to amount to obstructing or hindering the Commissioner's investigation should have been the subject of a separate complaint - whether error in Tribunal's order removing his name from the Roll Legislation Cited: Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW), Sch 5, cl 29 Evidence Act 1995 (NSW), s 140 Legal Profession Act 2004 (NSW), ss 525, 537, 540, 657, 670, 674 Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW), ss 48, 75A Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), r 51.53 Cases Cited: Dupal v Law Society of New South Wales [1990] NSWCA 56 Environment Protection Authority v Truegain Pty Ltd [2013] NSWCCA 204; 85 NSWLR 125 Ex parte Polley; Re McLennan (1947) 47 SR (NSW) 391 Gerlach v Clifton Bricks Pty Ltd [2002] HCA 22; 209 CLR 478 Guss v Johnstone [2000] FCA 1455 Legal Services Commissioner v Kumar [2013] NSWADT 34 Legal Services Commissioner v Kumar [2014] NSWCATOD 45 Lovell v Lovell (1950) 81 CLR 513 Rockdale Beef Pty Ltd v Industrial Relations Commission of New South Wales [2007] NSWCA 128; 165 IR 7 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Vijay Kumar (Appellant) Legal Services Commissioner (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: D Pritchard SC, A Macauley (Appellant) NJ Beaumont SC, R Withana (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate