NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Tuivaga v R [2015] NSWCCA 145 Hearing dates: 1 May 2015 Decision date: 17 June 2015 Before: Hoeben CJ at CL at [1] R A Hulme J at [63] Wilson J at [64] Decision: (1)Leave to appeal against sentence granted. (2)Appeal dismissed. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – sentence appeal – manslaughter – applicant part of a group who attacked victim – death caused by a firearm, the presence of which was unknown to the applicant – relationship between sentence imposed for manslaughter and pre-sentence custody – principle of totality – whether error of fact on part of sentencing judge – whether finding of special circumstances reflected in sentence – whether sentence manifestly excessive – application of parity principle – appeal dismissed. Cases Cited: Corda v R [2014] NSWCCA 281 Dinsdale v The Queen [2000] HCA 54; 202 CLR 321 England v R; Phanith v R [2009] NSWCCA 274 House v R [1936] HCA 40; 55 CLR 499 Jimmy v R [2010] NSWCCA 60; 269 ALR 115 Mammone v R [2013] NSWCCA 95 Postiglione v R [1997] HCA 26; 189 CLR 295 R v MMK [2006] NSWCCA 272; 164 A Crim R 481 R v Simpson [2001] NSWCCA 534; 53 NSWLR 704 R v Tuivaga [2013] NSWSC 1626 Stoeski v R [2014] NSWCCA 161 Tan v R [2014] NSWCCA 96 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Kirk Daniel Tuivaga – Applicant Regina – Respondent Crown Representation: Counsel: Ms H Cox – Applicant Ms T Smith – Respondent Crown
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate