NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Browning v R [2015] NSWCCA 147 Hearing dates: 1 June 2015 Date of orders: 17 June 2015 Decision date: 17 June 2015 Before: Gleeson JA at [1] Johnson J at [2] Garling J at [11] Decision: (1)Application for leave to appeal granted. (2)Appeal allowed. (3)Set aside the sentence imposed by Ellis DCJ in the District Court of NSW on 2 May 2014. (4)In lieu of that sentence, impose the following sentence: (a)The applicant is sentenced to a term of imprisonment for 7 years and 6 months to commence on 5 April 2013 and to expire on 4 October 2020. (b)A non-parole period of 4 years commencing on 5 April 2013 and expiring on 4 April 2017 is fixed. (5)The applicant is not to be released to parole before the expiry of his non parole period. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – appeal – sentence – whether error in finding that offence in mid-range of seriousness – whether error that no connection between applicant's offending and depressive illness existed – whether failure to take into account mitigating factors – whether sentencing judge erred in inviting Crown to give opinion as to sentence – whether sentence manifestly excessive – no ground of appeal upheld – appeal allowed to amend agreed error in commencement date of sentence Legislation Cited: Crimes (Domestic and Personal Violence) Act 2007 Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 Crimes Act 1900 Criminal Procedure Act 1986 Mental Health Act 2007 Cases Cited: Attorney General's Application Under Section 37 Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (No. 1 of 2002) [2002] NSWCCA 518; 56 NSWLR 146 Barbaro v The Queen; Zirilli v The Queen [2014] HCA 2; (2014) 88 ALJR 372 CMB v Attorney General for New South Wales [2015] HCA 9; (2015) 89 ALJR 407 John Fairfax Publications Pty Limited v Ryde Local Court [2005] NSWCA 101; 62 NSWLR 512 Mulato v R [2006] NSWCCA 282 R v Dinh [2010] NSWCCA 74; (2010) 199 A Crim R 573 R v Hamid [2006] NSWCCA 302; 164 A Crim R 179 Texts Cited: Not applicable Category: Principal judgment Parties: Peter Browning (Applicant) Regina Representation: Counsel: J I Ghabrial (Applicant) K McKay (Crown)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate