NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: New South Wales Crime Commission v White (No 2) [2015] NSWSC 762 Hearing dates: 15 June 2015 Date of orders: 15 June 2015 Decision date: 15 June 2015 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Campbell J Decision: (1) Pursuant to rule 13.1 UCPR judgment be given for the plaintiff on its claim for an order pursuant to s 22 Criminal Assets Recovery Act that the interests in property of Rodney Boyd White (the defendant) in the property specified in the Schedule hereto (being interests in property of a person, namely the defendant, suspected by Jonathan Lee Spark, an authorised officer for the purposes of the Act, of having engaged in serious crime related activity) be forfeited to, and vest in, the Crown. (2) The defendant pay the costs of this application. (3) Leave is granted to the defendant pursuant to s 25(4)(a) and 26(4)(a) of the Act to make application for exclusion orders on or before 15 December 2015 or such other date as the Court shall specify. Catchwords: PROCEDURE – civil – summary disposal – summary judgment – application for forfeiture order Legislation Cited: Criminal Assets Recovery Act 1990 (NSW); Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) Category: Consequential orders (other than Costs) Parties: New South Wales Crime Commission (Plaintiff) Rodney Boyd White (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: Ian Temby QC together with Ellen Goh (Crime Commission) Defendant in person
Solicitors: Crime Commission File Number(s): 2014/00204099
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate