NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: TA v R [2015] NSWCCA 151 Hearing dates: 3 June 2015 Date of orders: 19 June 2015 Decision date: 19 June 2015 Before: Ward JA at [1]; Johnson J at [44]; Garling J at [45] Decision: 1. Extend time for the filing of the notice of application for leave to appeal to 4 March 2015. 2. Dismiss the application for leave to appeal. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – leave to appeal – against conviction – whether inconsistent verdicts – whether guilty verdicts unreasonable in light of acquittals on other counts Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900, ss 59, 61, 61I Criminal Appeal Act 1912, s 5 Weapons Prohibition Act 1998, s 7 Cases Cited: Dungay v R; R v Dungay [2010] NSWCCA 82 Jones v The Queen [1997] HCA 56; (1997) 191 CLR 439 M v The Queen [1994] HCA 63; (1994) 181 CLR 487 MFA v The Queen [2002] HCA 53; (2002) 213 CLR 606 O'Grady v R [2014] HCA 38; (2014) 252 CLR 621 Osland v R [1998] HCA 75; (1998) 197 CLR 316 R v Markuleski [2001] NSWCCA 290; (2001) 52 NSWLR 82 R v Murray (1987) 11 NSWLR 12 Rasic v R [2009] NSWCCA 202 Raumakita v R [2011] NSWCCA 126; (2011) 210 A Crim R 326 Still v R [2010] NSWCCA 131 TK v R [2009] NSWCCA 151; (2004) 74 NSWLR 299 Category: Principal judgment Parties: TA (Applicant) Crown (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: AJ Karim (Applicant) G O'Rourke (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate