NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Hales v Parramatta City Council [2015] NSWLEC 1210 Hearing dates: 22 May 2015 Date of orders: 17 June 2015 Decision date: 17 June 2015 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Tuor C Decision: 1. The appeal is dismissed. 2. The development application (505/2014) to construct an extension of a driveway within the front setback area and a second vehicle crossing with a gate at 84 Eastwood Avenue, Epping, is refused. 3. The exhibits, except Exhibits 1 and A, are returned. Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION: extension of driveway and a second vehicle crossing with a gate. Impact on character of the area. Legislation Cited: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (LEC Act) Parramatta Local Environmental Plan 2011 Cases Cited: Davies v Penrith City Council [2013] NSWLEC 1141 Pafburn v North Sydney Council [2005] NSWLEC 444 Category: Principal judgment Parties: James and Emily Hales (Applicant)
Parramatta City Council (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Mr M Staunton (Applicant)
Solicitors: Mr G Hartley of Hartley Solicitors (Applicant)
Mr A Gough of Storey Gough Lawyers (Respondent) File Number(s): 10233 of 2015
Judgment 1. This is an appeal under s 97 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (EPA Act) against the refusal by Parramatta City Council (council) of a development application (505/2014) to construct an extension of a driveway within the front setback area and a second vehicle crossing with a gate at 84 Eastwood Avenue, Epping (site). 2. The key issue in dispute between the parties is whether the proposal is inconsistent with the character of the area (Contention 1).
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate