NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Hancock v Rinehart [2015] NSWSC 788 Hearing dates: In chambers Date of orders: 18 June 2015 Decision date: 18 June 2015 Jurisdiction: Equity Division Before: Brereton J Decision: No further undertaking required Catchwords: ORDERS – undertakings – where order expressed to be upon undertaking – whether order records undertaking given or is conditional upon undertaking being given Cases Cited: Hancock v Rinehart [2015] NSWSC 646 Category: Consequential orders (other than Costs) Parties: John Langley Hancock (first plaintiff) Bianca Hope Rinehart (second plaintiff) Gina Hope Rinehart (first defendant) Ginia Hope Frances Rinehart (second defendant) Hope Rinehart Welker (third defendant) Hancock Prospecting Pty Ltd (fourth defendant) Hope Downs Iron Ore Pty Ltd (fifth defendant) Representation: Counsel: C Withers w N Zerial & A Hochroth (plaintiffs) N Hutley SC w B. McClintock SC, C Bova & J Hutton (first defendant) RG McHugh SC w PW Flynn (second defendant) M Deutsch (solicitor) (third defendant) DB Studdy SC w C Colquhoun (fourth & fifth defendants)
Solicitors: Yeldhams Price O'Brien Lusk (plaintiffs) Corrs Chambers Westgarth (first, fourth & fifth defendants) Gadens Lawyers (second defendant) Deutsch Miller (third defendant) File Number(s): 2011/285907
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate