NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Leighton v R [2015] NSWCCA 156 Hearing dates: 27 April 2015 Date of orders: 24 June 2015 Decision date: 24 June 2015 Before: Hoeben CJ at CL at [1] Adams J at [2] Wilson J at [8] Decision: Orders: Leave to appeal on grounds 7, 9, 10, and 12 is refused. The appeal is dismissed.
Answers to the Questions Posed by the Primary Judge: 1. No. 2. Yes. 3. Yes. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – appeal – s5F Criminal Appeal Act 1912 – decision to admit tendency and coincidence evidence – relevance – probative value – expert evidence relating to effects of Nitrous oxide – whether denial of procedural fairness – whether proper consideration of possibility of contamination Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 Criminal Appeal Act 1912 Criminal Procedure Act 1986 Evidence Act 1995 Cases Cited: DSJ v R [2012] NSWCCA 9 Graham v The Queen [1998] HCA 61; (1998) 195 CLR 606 House v the King (1936) 55 CLR 499 Papakosmas v The Queen [1999] HCA 37; (1999) 196 CLR 297 Pfennig v The Queen [1995] HCA 7; 182 CLR 461 R v BWM (1997) 91 A Crim R 260 R v Davis [2004] NSWCCA 298 R v DBG [2002] NSWCCA 328; (2002) 133 A Crim R 227 R v Le [2000] NSWCCA 49 Regina v Folbigg [2005] NSWCCA 23; 152 A Crim R 35 TS v R [2014] NSWCCA 174 Versi v R [2013] NSWCCA 206 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Rodger Garry Leighton (Appellant) Regina (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Mr. A. Miller (Appellant) Mr. Neil Adams (Respondent Crown)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate