NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Majok v R [2015] NSWCCA 160 Hearing dates: 20 April 2015 Decision date: 19 June 2015 Before: Hoeben CJ at CL at [1]; Hall J at [2]; R A Hulme J at [3] Decision: 1. Time to file Notice of Application for Leave to Appeal extended to 19 January 2015. 2. Leave to appeal against conviction refused. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – appeal against conviction - function and duty of trial judge in summing up to jury – contention that trial judge expressed agreement with matters favourable to Crown and continuously undermined defence arguments causing unfair trial and miscarriage of justice – need to consider in context of entire summing up - single complaint raised at trial on point lacking merit – other complaints raised for first time on appeal – leave to appeal refused Cases Cited: Domican v The Queen [1992] HCA 13; 173 CLR 555 R v Heuston (1995) 81 A Crim R 387 R v Meher [2004] NSWCCA 355 R v Sukkar [2005] NSWCCA 54 R v Zorad (1990) 19 NSWLR 91 Robinson v R [2006] NSWCCA 192; 162 A Crim R 88 RPS v The Queen [2000] HCA 3; 199 CLR 620 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Kachuol Majok (Applicant) Regina (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Mr P Lange (Applicant) Mr K McKay (Crown)
Solicitors: Hanna Legal Solicitor for Public Prosecutions File Number(s): 2009/243170 Decision under appeal Court or tribunal: District Court Date of Decision: 28 March 2013 Before: Bennett SC DCJ File Number(s): 2009/243170
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate