NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Mani v WorkCover Authority of NSW [2015] NSWCATAD 128 Hearing dates: 11 December 2014 and 4 March 2015 Decision date: 23 June 2015 Jurisdiction: Administrative and Equal Opportunity Division Before: J Lucy, Senior Member Decision: The first respondent's decision to cancel the applicant's security clearance is affirmed. Catchwords: EXPLOSIVES - security clearance – cancellation of security clearance – fit and proper person – commission of offences by applicant – history of apprehended violence orders against applicant - whether applicant rehabilitated Legislation Cited: Explosives Act 2003 (NSW) Explosives Regulation 2013 (NSW) Administrative Decisions Review Act 1997 (NSW) Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW) Cases Cited: YJ v Chief Executive Officer, WorkCover Authority [2006] NSWADT 264 Stevens v WorkCover Authority of New South Wales [2014] NSWCATAD 202 Gomes v Roads and Maritime Services [2014] NSWCATOD 130 Loye v Director General, Department of Transport [2000] NSWADT 145 Assi v Roads & Maritime Services [2013] NSWADT 159 Saadieh v Director General, Department of Transport [1999] NSWADT 68 Smith v Commissioner of Police, NSW Police Force & NSW Fair Trading [2014] NSWCATAD 184 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Rakesh Mani (Applicant) WorkCover Authority of NSW (First Respondent) NSW Commissioner of Police (Second Respondent) Representation: Counsel: I Mescher (Applicant) H El-Hage (First and Second Respondents)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate