NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Attorney General for New South Wales v CMB [2015] NSWCCA 166 Hearing dates: 12 June 2015 Decision date: 25 June 2015 Before: Leeming JA; Simpson JA; Hamill J Decision: Appeal dismissed. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW - Crown appeal against sentence - residual discretion - guilty pleas to aggravated sexual assault and indecent sexual assault - offender's earlier guilty pleas to sexual assaults upon same complainant at same time disposed of under Pre-Trial Diversion of Offenders Act 1985 (NSW) - procedure not available in respect of later offences - offender sentenced to bonds - Crown appeal allowed and custodial sentence imposed - offender served almost a year in prison - High Court allowed further appeal and remitted matter to this Court and restored original orders of District Court - appellable error in original sentence established - having regard to the offender's time in custody and other subjective circumstances, Crown appeal dismissed Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), ss 61J, 61M Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW), s 9 Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW), s 5D Interpretation Act 1987 (NSW), s 30 Pre-Trial Diversion of Offenders Act 1985 (NSW), ss 2A, 3A, 11, 14, 23, 24, 30, 30A Pre-Trial Diversion of Offenders Regulation 2005 (NSW) Subordinate Legislation Act 1989 (NSW), ss 10, 11 Subordinate Legislation (Postponement of Repeal) Order (No 2) 2011 Cases Cited: Barbaro v The Queen; Zirilli v The Queen [2014] HCA 2; 88 ALJR 372 CMB v Attorney General for New South Wales [2014] HCATrans 206 CMB v Attorney General for New South Wales [2015] HCA 9; 89 ALJR 407 Eastman v The Queen [2000] HCA 29; 203 CLR 1 Environment Protection Authority v Condon [2014] NSWCA 149; 86 NSWLR 499 Green v The Queen; Quinn v The Queen [2011] HCA 49; 244 CLR 462 House v The King [1936] HCA 40; 55 CLR 499 Kentwell v The Queen [2014] HCA 37; 88 ALJR 947 Mickelberg v The Queen (1989) 167 CLR 259 R v Borkowski [2009] NSWCCA 102; 195 A Crim R 1 R v Carroll; Carroll v R [2010] NSWCCA 55; 77 NSWLR 45 R v CMB [2014] NSWCCA 5 R v Ellis (1986) 6 NSWLR 603 R v Smith [2007] NSWCCA 100 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Attorney General for New South Wales (Appellant) CMB (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: N Adams SC, BK Baker (Appellant) C Loukas SC, B Dean (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate