NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Shaw v 3D Design and Build Pty Ltd [2015] NSWCATAP 117 Hearing dates: On the papers Date of orders: 23 June 2015 Decision date: 23 June 2015 Jurisdiction: Appeal Panel Before: N Hennessy LCM, Deputy President R Titterton, Senior Member Decision: 1. Leave is refused for the appellants to appeal on grounds other than questions of law.
2. The appeal is dismissed. Catchwords: CIVIL AND ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL dispute under Home Building Act 1989 (NSW) – error of law – asking the wrong question – error of law identified – new hearing on facts found by Tribunal below – same decision - appeal dismissed. Legislation Cited: Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW) Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (NSW) Home Building Act 1989 (NSW) Cases Cited: Craig v State of South Australia (1995) 184 CLR 163 Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Yusuf (2001) 206 CLR 323 Texts Cited: Dr Damien Cremean and others, Brooking on Building Contracts (5th ed, Lexis Nexis Butterworths Australia) Philip Bambagiotti, Building Disputes and the Home Building Act 1989 (NSW), (2012, Law Book Co) Category: Principal judgment Parties: Leonie Shaw and Rodney Curry (Appellants) 3D Design and Build Pty Ltd (Respondent) Representation: Solicitors:
Macquarie Legal Centre (Appellants) CA Williams Legal (Respondent) File Number(s): AP 14/47303 Decision under appeal Court or tribunal: Civil and Administrative Tribunal Jurisdiction: Consumer and Commercial Division Date of Decision: 3 September 2014 Before: C Paull, Senior Member File Number(s): HB 14/10675
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate